PRESIDENTIAL PROTECTION: A SHIELD FOR PRESIDENTS?

The question of whether presidents should be granted immunity from legal liability is a debated one. Advocates for immunity argue that it is essential to allow presidents to adequately perform their duties without the constant threat of legal challenges. They contend that immunity safeguards against unfounded claims and allows focus on governing. C

The idea of immunity has always been intriguing. A robust physiological shield is often seen as a measure of strength and vitality. But could immunity be more than just a physical safeguard? Could it, in fact, become a weapon to influence power dynamics within societies? The potential for immunity-based advantage is a grave issue Moral questio